Message-ID: <32272044.1075843084198.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 04:00:00 -0800 (PST)
From: bruno.gaillard@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, roger.yang@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, 
	susan.mara@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com
Subject: GRC2 Assigned Commissioner Ruling/Schedule
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Bruno Gaillard
X-To: Jeff Dasovich, Roger Yang, Mona L Petrochko, Susan J Mara, Harry Kingerski
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\General rate case(s)
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Some issues are to be addressed in other proceedings and not litigated in the 
GRC2. PG&E must remove all portions of its filed testimony that are to be 
addressed in other proceedings.

Advice Letter Filing:
Applicability of Schedule ED through the rate freeze, pre existing Economic 
Development Rate Schedule terminated in Dec. 1998

Post Transition Ratemaking Proceeding (PTR): 
PG&E's proposals in the GRC2 WILL NOT supersede revenue allocation and rate 
design proposals in the PTR
PTR issues are:
Allocation and rate design of CTCs.
Ratemaking issues related to the RRB memorandum account, PPP and Nuc. 
Decommissioning.

Revenue Cycle Services (RCS):
All RCS ratemaking issues will be litigated in the RCS proceeding.

GRC2:
Schedule EB (post transition economic development rate schedule)
Bypass Charges
VBU
Rate design for distribution 

GRC2 Schedule Highlights
The schedule is contingent upon the issuance of a final decision in GRC. PG&E 
is also schedule to provide models and comparison exhibits.
     Scenario 1  Scenario 2  
GRC1 final decision   12/2  12/16    
ORA testimony    1/7  1/25
Intervenors Testimony   2/14  3/4
Rebuttal - all parties   3/6  3/24
Hearings    3/20 to 3/31 4/10 to 4/14
     4/10 to 4/14 4/25 to 5/5
PD     8/2000  8/2000        Decision    Fall 200  Fall 2000