Subject: FW: PG&E Detailed Study - CSUF
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:08:00 -0800 (PST)

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: "Fantz, Donald" <[email-masked]>@ENRON@EES 
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 2:34 PM
To: Cone, Rob
Cc: vanUlden, Dirk; Crevelt, Richard; "Kinert, Robert" <[email-masked]>; 
"Hagen, John H" <[email-masked]>; "'Dick Smith@FSU'" <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: PG&E Detailed Study - CSUF

Rob,

Thank you for the opportunity to clarify.  There is no rule for fifteen days
per se.  Based on the date we delivered the final study to CSUF/Enron (Jan.
12, 2000), we would need an answer back in 15 days in order to have a
reasonable chance at making your stated schedule (as shared with us on
11/15/99 and re-stated on 1/5/00) for getting the new substation on line.
You actually have 60 days to respond.

In the Detailed Study, we requested a written notice to proceed by February
1, 2000 to make CSUF/Enron's target completion date for the new  substation
online.  CSUF/Enron can take up to 60 days, but doing so will impact the
desired schedule and necessitate a scheduling change.

Don Fantz
PG&E

> ----------
> From:  Cone, Rob[SMTP:[email-masked]]
> Sent:  Friday, January 14, 2000 4:16 PM
> To:  Fantz, Donald
> Cc:  vanUlden, Dirk; Crevelt, Richard
> Subject:  PG&E Detailed Study - CSUF
>
> Don
>
> Can you indicate the PG&E rule that requires a response to a Detailed
> Study within a fifteen day window after receipt of the Study?
>
> Rob Cone
>
> Project Manager
> Enron Energy Services
> 12647 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 500
> San Ramon, CA 94583
> Ph:925.543.3701, Fax:925.543.3550
> Pager:888.397.5826
>
>