Message-ID: <2844644.1075843210232.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 06:06:00 -0800 (PST) From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com To: sue.nord@enron.com Subject: Re: The Answer Is: To CLEC! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jeff Dasovich X-To: Sue Nord X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf If possible, that would be perfect, and greatly appreciated. Sue Nord 11/21/2000 12:13 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: The Answer Is: To CLEC! I'm glad you'll be working on this. Should we try to schedule meetings for Thursday afternoons, to coincide with your trips to Houston for the international group? Happy Thanksgiving to you, too! Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 11/21/2000 10:14 AM To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donald_Lassere@enron.net, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Xi_Xi@enron.net Subject: Re: The Answer Is: To CLEC! Congratulations. And count me in. We're off to the races. Best, Jeff And a very Happy Thanksgiving. Sue Nord 11/21/2000 10:01 AM To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald_Lassere@enron.net, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi_Xi@enron.net, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: The Answer Is: To CLEC! Hello Everyone, We've gotten word back from Jim Fallon to go forward with obtaining CLEC licenses. This brings us to the next set of questions: Which entity do we license? EBS or ETI? If we license ETI as a CLEC, can we transfer EBS' IXC licenses to ETI? Do we get CLEC licenses in all states, or some strategic subset of states? I'd like to put together a group to address these questions, working with legal, tax, and commercial people. Please let me know if you are interested in participating in this group. It most likely will involve a fairly intensive schedule of meetings in Houston during December. We should hold off on filing new IXC license applications until we have resolved the EBS vs. ETI issue. For states where an EBS IXC license application currently is pending, let's not be too aggressive in pushing those applications forward over the next month. Give me a call if this creates a problem in any of your states. Also, Scott, please let everyone know if there are any fiber-build states where you think the delay would be a problem. Feel free to give me a call if you have any questions. Sue