Message-ID: <1525625.1075843214386.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 05:22:00 -0800 (PST)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: paul.kaufman@enron.com
Subject: Re: Options the Governor's Considering
Cc: harry.kingerski@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, 
	richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: harry.kingerski@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, 
	richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: Paul Kaufman
X-cc: Harry Kingerski, James D Steffes, Richard Shapiro, Steven J Kean
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Sounds good.



	Paul Kaufman@ECT
	12/04/2000 12:57 PM
		
		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry 
Kingerski, Jeff Dasovich
		 Subject: Re: Options the Governor's Considering

Our messages are getting a little mixed.   So .. to that end, can we have a 
day or two to:  (1) figure out whether we want a reverse auction, competitive 
bidding for PLR, a GCIM-like mechanism? and (2) rationalize the various 
mechanisms if want it all.  

I'm confident that we can rationalize all of these mechanism--e.g, we can 
limit the percentage of load put up for auction, etc. if we put our minds to 
it.  However, we haven't done so yet.  

We will discuss this tomorrow in SFO.