Subject: Re: DRAFT of materials for Governor
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:47:00 -0800 (PST)

Scott:
Thanks very much for the comments.  On the demand buy-down, I should have 
mentioned that I got a late call from the Gov's office asking for more detail 
on that proposal, which we'll likely forward along tomorrow morning, with the 
comments on the Gov's proposals.  Will try to work the other comments in.  
Thanks again.

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Stoness@EES
	01/02/2001 06:30 PM
		 
		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black
		 Subject: Re: DRAFT of materials for Governor

2nd Comments:

 We are missing in Increasing Supply section
running of existing older generation combined with mitigating reductions in 
emissions.  
missing Concrete suggestions: 
California Energy Commission sponsored process to determine and implement 
actions that will:
result in 10,000 MW of new energy efficient generation being built within 
California within 2002; and 
running of existing older generation combined with mitigating reductions in 
emissions

 We are missing in decreasing load section
missing concrete suggestions: 
The California Public Utility Commission, will immediately seek bids, in the 
form of rate changes and regulatory commitments that would result in 2,000 MW 
of reduced on peak load by June 1, 2001
The California Public Utility Commission, will immediately seek bids, in the 
form of rate changes and regulatory commitments that would result in 5,000 MW 
of reduced overall load by January 1, 2002.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Stoness/HOU/EES on 01/02/2001 06:18 
PM ---------------------------

Scott Stoness
01/02/2001 06:18 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black 
Subject: Re: DRAFT of materials for Governor  

1st Comments from Scott

We are missing:

Positive spin at front
Governor Davis is committed to solving the California energy crisis by:
Developing consumer driven solutions
Protecting customers from short term market aberrations
Continuing to expand the consumers ability to choose
We are missing thoughtful Orderly Process
Maintain 1890 in interim
All customers treated the same
Would replace "maintain a reliable distribution network" with "assure 
investment community"
Assurances around forward purchases
Assurances around prudent purchases to keep lights
Assurances, if needed through increases, via tax refundable.
Maintain AB1890 until orderly process arrives with better solution
Would drop specifics arount rate increase. 

More to come......