Message-ID: <19911269.1075843870408.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:34:00 -0800 (PST) From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com To: robert.williams@enron.com Subject: Initial contacts re continuance of Negative CTC complaints Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jeff Dasovich X-To: Robert C Williams X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 04:34 PM ----- MDay 03/21/2001 04:11 PM To: "'Mike D Smith'" , "'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'" , "'Sandi McCubbin Enron SF'" , "'Sue Mara at Enron SF'" cc: Subject: Initial contacts re continuance of Negative CTC complaints I spoke with ABAG attorney Kenneth Moy and APS attorney Dan Douglas. Neither was thrilled with the Wood/Barnett draw, but neither was immediately warm to the notion of a negotiated continuance. I outlined the arguments against charging into the guns of Wood and Barnett, and reminded them that there could very likely be delays anyway as a result of the CPUC's continued indecision about the end of the rate freeze--which looks to be increasing as a result of the Administration's deadlock with the utilities. They both indicated that they would discuss the matter with their clients and get back to us shortly. I suspect at least one of them will say "no we want to go ahead even if you do not." As soon as I hear from them, I will contact SCE and PG&E. Mike Day