Message-ID: <18614609.1075843883655.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 02:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: stephanie.miller@enron.com
Subject: RE: SoCal Allocation of Backbone Capacity
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: Stephanie Miller
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

It was only a draft.  The commission has to vote it out for it to become 
effective.  They've delayed doing that.  Therefore it's status quo on the 
SoCalGas system.



	Stephanie Miller/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 08:58 AM
		 
		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: RE: SoCal Allocation of Backbone Capacity

Jeff - I read this in Com. Bilas' draft final opinion. Are you saying that 
the draft final opinion was never truly final? 

I am looking for the windowing process and how intrastate capacity is 
allocated. Any suggestions?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jeff Dasovich  
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:39 PM
To: Stephanie Miller
Subject: Re: SoCal Allocation of Backbone Capacity

The interim settlement never got voted out.  Therefore it ain't official, so 
there's no requirement yet to refile anything.  (Welcome to California.)  In 
fact, folks are still trying to get the Commission to reject the IS and 
approve the one that we worked on (though the chances of that are not huge, 
at this point).  Give a holler if there's anything else.

Best,
Jeff




	Stephanie Miller 04/24/2001 02:00 PM 	   To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron  
cc:   Subject: SoCal Allocation of Backbone Capacity


In Commissioner Bilas' draft Final Opinion of the IS (page 51), Socal was 
ordered to withdraw advice letter 2837 a file a new advise letter to 
implement a revised physical receipt point allocation system.  Was that ever 
filed and, if so, can you please send a copy?

Regards,

Stephanie