Message-ID: <13968974.1075852601601.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 07:03:13 -0700 (PDT) From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com To: richard.shapiro@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com Subject: FW: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Dasovich, Jeff X-To: Shapiro, Richard , Mara, Susan , Steffes, James D. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: Shankman-J X-FileName: JSHANKM (Non-Privileged).pst FYI. Per my voicemail--response from Jeremy regarding our approach to last week's PUC decision. We'll set up a call for later in the day. Best, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Blachman, Jeremy Sent: Sat 9/22/2001 5:00 AM To: Dasovich, Jeff Cc: Subject: Re: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA We must go after this. I need some specific direction with exactly what you would like us to have our clients do. I see this as breaking our market down into the following as each are effected a bit differently: - a specific alignment with the contracts we signed in August - those clients we are marketing to, and can't sign a new contract due to the suspension - existing clients whom we are risk with if there are ANY restrictions on extensions Suggest that we set-up a call on Mon or Tues. Would like myself, Angela Schwarz, Lamar Frazier, David Cox, Gayle Muench and Michael Mann in attendance