Message-ID: <11995080.1075851617923.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: michael.tribolet@enron.com
Subject: RE: Edison's Argument Regarding PX Credit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDASOVIC>
X-To: Tribolet, Michael </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mtribole>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Sent Items
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst

You should have it already.  Give me a call when you get a minute.  Thanks.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael  
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:07 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Edison's Argument Regarding PX Credit

713 646-8525

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:23 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda
Subject:	Edison's Argument Regarding PX Credit

I'd like to fax you something that Edison sent in support of their argument that:

1) by virture of the PX credit framework, DA customers contributed to Edison's undercollection, and,
2) DA customers should therefore contribute to the recovery of the undercollection.

Could I get your fax numbers?  Would like to get your comments once you've reviewed the argument.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff