Message-ID: <9562122.1075857334284.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 01:55:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mike.curry@enron.com
To: robin.kittel@enron.com, ron.mcnamara@enron.com
Subject: Sub-QSE's
Cc: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, ron.mcnamara@enron.com, robin.kittel@enron.com, 
	lance.cunningham@enron.com, clint.dean@enron.com, 
	smith.day@enron.com, lloyd.will@enron.com, juan.hernandez@enron.com, 
	juan.padron@enron.com, thresa.allen@enron.com, 
	mitch.robinson@enron.com, bruce.sukaly@enron.com, 
	michelle.parks@enron.com, christopher.ahn@enron.com, 
	drew.tingleaf@enron.com, david.portz@enron.com, steve.nat@enron.com, 
	madhup.kumar@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, ron.mcnamara@enron.com, robin.kittel@enron.com, 
	lance.cunningham@enron.com, clint.dean@enron.com, 
	smith.day@enron.com, lloyd.will@enron.com, juan.hernandez@enron.com, 
	juan.padron@enron.com, thresa.allen@enron.com, 
	mitch.robinson@enron.com, bruce.sukaly@enron.com, 
	michelle.parks@enron.com, christopher.ahn@enron.com, 
	drew.tingleaf@enron.com, david.portz@enron.com, steve.nat@enron.com, 
	madhup.kumar@enron.com
X-From: Mike Curry
X-To: Robin Kittel, Ron McNamara
X-cc: Doug Gilbert-Smith, Ron McNamara, Robin Kittel, Lance Cunningham, Clint Dean, Smith L Day, Lloyd Will, Juan Hernandez, Juan Padron, Thresa A Allen, Mitch Robinson, Bruce Sukaly, Michelle Parks, Christopher Ahn, Drew Tingleaf, David Portz, Steve Nat, Madhup Kumar
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Clint_Dean_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Dean-C
X-FileName: cdean.nsf

Robin/Ron:  Must get rid of this sub-QSE language.  Please give me a shout 
asap to discuss.  Having these sub-QSE's is bad for EPMI for the following 
reasons: 

(1) sub-QSE's are settled as stand-alone QSE's and thus 
 - EPMI gets smaller deadband limits for each sub-QSE 
 - Wind deviations could not be covered with % deadband of other schedules 
(wind would have to be setup as its own sub-QSE)
 
(2) sub-QSE's significantly affect EPMI's ability to make profits by 
optimizing a portfolio of customers
 - EPMI is better off with one large QSE that it can share/balance among 
different schedules
 - Customers could request to be setup as a sub-QSE and it would be difficult 
for EPMI to optimize between customers and make profits.  We lose the  
ability of having a black box where customers can not see how we optimize our 
portfolio.

Thanks, - Mike


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Curry/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 09:29 AM 
---------------------------


"Moseley, Cheryl" <CMoseley@ercot.com> on 12/05/2000 08:32:41 PM
To: 1 Retail Users Group Ad Hoc Subcommittee <isonp@ercot.com>
cc:  
Subject: Proposed modification to PIP 108



Attached is the proposed modification to PIP 108,
Subordinate QSEs.



 - 108PIP sub-QSE.doc