Message-ID: <4218560.1075854534537.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:11:00 -0800 (PST)
From: david.delainey@enron.com
To: hunter.shively@enron.com, jonathan.mckay@enron.com, laura.luce@enron.com, 
	rob.milnthorp@enron.com, john.lavorato@enron.com
Subject: Eastern Canada
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: David W Delainey
X-To: Hunter S Shively, Jonathan McKay, Laura Luce, Rob Milnthorp, John J Lavorato
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \David_Delainey_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Delainey-D
X-FileName: ddelain.nsf

Guys, I can't recall how the corporate opportunity is managed between Canada 
and the US for these customers particularily with regard to their 
transactions in Michigan et al.  Is Eastern Canada now managed by the Central 
desk from a trading and mid-market point of view since Story came down to 
Houston? How are the structured deals managed?  Is this still the right split 
for the business?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/20/2001 
06:06 PM ---------------------------
From: Laura Luce@ENRON on 01/19/2001 11:49 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Eastern Canada

As we continue to define goals/objectives and coverage staffing in alignment 
with the corresponding trading group, I assumed that Eastern Canada 
origination would fall within the central region.  Specifically opportunities 
with Enbridge, Consumers and Union due to mid-market/trading coverage 
previously being at the central desk.  I understand there is history to this 
division and I have no desire to start any new issues or create larger 
organizational issues.   In the gas re-organization, how did you 
strategically divide Eastern Canada?

I would appreciate your direction or decision.

Thanx,
Laura