Subject: FW: Dabhol Power Project - GOI Arbitration
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT)

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lundstrom, Bruce  
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:34 AM
To:	Hughes, James A.; Cline, Wade; Walls Jr., Rob; Glisan, Ben
Cc:	Harris, Stephanie J
Subject:	Dabhol Power Project - GOI Arbitration

Folks -

Some background on our presiding arbitrator for the GOI arbitrator.

Bruce

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/23/2001 07:35 AM ---------------------------

"Walker, Christopher" <[email-masked]> on 10/22/2001 10:07:17 PM
To:	"[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
cc:	"[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>, "Walker, Christopher" <[email-masked]>, "Quinn, Kelly Michael" <[email-masked]> 

Subject:	Dabhol Power Project - GOI Arbitration

Bruce,

Herewith the bio(hagio)graphical details of Arthur Marriott QC from the
Debevoise & Plimpton website.

My experiences of Arthur Marriott QC as a presiding arbitrator are good. He
is not a lawyer of the same calibre as Lord Mustill or Andrew Rogers QC (nor
would he,I think,claim to be).  But he is very practical and knows what he
is doing.  He wants to get on with things where he can. He is also quite
adroit at managing tribunals. That is almost certainly going to prove to be
a necessary skill with Kamal Hossain who will see his role as advocating the
GOI's position and engineering whatever delay the GOI wants. I am hopeful
that (eventually) Kamal Hossain will overplay his hand,which will leave
us,in practical terms,with a Rogers-Marriott tribunal.

> fyi
>  <<Debevoise & Plimpton  Lawyers.htm>>

_____________________________________________________________

This e-mail is sent by or on behalf of Linklaters,
10/F Alexandra House, Chater Road, Hong Kong.

A list of the firm's principals will be provided to the
recipient(s) of this email upon request.

This statement is made in compliance with the Law Society of
Hong Kong's Practice Direction on the Format of Electronic
Communications.

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
_____________________________________________________________

 - Debevoise & Plimpton  Lawyers.htm 

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>