Message-ID: <29484138.1075863535271.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:47:20 -0800 (PST) From: jarek.astramowicz@enron.com To: adam.overfield@enron.com, ed.cattigan@enron.com, krzysztof.forycki@enron.com, anne.edgley@enron.com, lloyd.wantschek@enron.com, james.derrick@enron.com Subject: RE: Resolution No 9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Astramowicz, Jarek X-To: Overfield, Adam , Cattigan, Ed , Forycki, Krzysztof , Edgley, Anne , Wantschek, Lloyd , Derrick Jr., James X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JDERRIC (Non-Privileged)\Derrick Jr., James\Deleted Items X-Origin: Derrick-J X-FileName: JDERRIC (Non-Privileged).pst The package is significantly higher than what the industry peers would receive in this position and in this market. I wish we had a chance to discuss this issue internally first. In case I were to retain him as part of Enron Poland at a later date - I can not justify this level of remuneration as part of my budget. Jarek -----Original Message----- From: Overfield, Adam Sent: 15 November 2001 17:41 To: Astramowicz, Jarek; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject: RE: Resolution No 9 Jarek I have discussed this with Jacek. The reason for increasing Jacek's package is retention. Adam -----Original Message----- From: Astramowicz, Jarek Sent: 15 November 2001 16:24 To: Cattigan, Ed; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject: RE: Resolution No 9 Has this package been discussed with Jacek yet at all ? -----Original Message----- From: Cattigan, Ed Sent: 15 November 2001 16:56 To: Overfield, Adam; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject: Resolution No 9 Hi Attached is resolution 9 filled in with Jacek's remuneration for you perusal prior to the Board meeting. regards Ed << File: RESOLUTION NO 9.doc >>