Message-ID: <9715748.1075861423553.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:20:54 -0800 (PST)
From: james.derrick@enron.com
Subject: FW: Resolution No 9
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Derrick Jr., James </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDERRIC>
X-To: Evans, Mark (London Legal) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EU/cn=Recipients/cn=MEVANS>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \JDERRIC (Non-Privileged)\Derrick Jr., James\Sent Items
X-Origin: Derrick-J
X-FileName: JDERRIC (Non-Privileged).pst



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Overfield, Adam  
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:41 AM
To:	Astramowicz, Jarek; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

Jarek

I have discussed this with Jacek.  The reason for increasing Jacek's package is retention.

Adam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Astramowicz, Jarek  
Sent:	15 November 2001 16:24
To:	Cattigan, Ed; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

Has this package been discussed with Jacek yet at all ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cattigan, Ed  
Sent:	15 November 2001 16:56
To:	Overfield, Adam; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Resolution No 9

Hi

Attached is resolution 9 filled in with Jacek's remuneration for you perusal prior to the Board meeting.

regards

Ed

 << File: RESOLUTION NO 9.doc >>