Subject: Re: Valero -- Meter 8018
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT)

Does it make a difference  if the information is communicated via a copy of 
customer "force majeure" letter or should it only be communicated
 via notes mail.  
 
There are several ways to communicate effectively issues that is beneficial 
to other departments, do you have a preference?

   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Pat Clynes @ ENRON                           08/29/2000 10:13 PM

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Valero -- Meter 8018  

Robert,
This is an idea of the type of information that should be communicated.  
Thanks,  Pat

Daren J Farmer@ECT
01/27/2000 03:23 PM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Valero -- Meter 8018

FYI.  We need to make sure that this kind of communication conitinues to flow 
downstream.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/27/2000 
03:22 PM ---------------------------
Kenneth Seaman   01/27/2000 02:00 PM

To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E 
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Valero -- Meter 8018

Deliveries to this meter were halted late in the day of January 20. The 
customer has maintenance issues that necessitated an earlier than planned 
turnaround.

It is my understanding from our trader this is another force majure situation 
resulting in no sale or buyback at this meter commencing with the shutdown.

Please take this into consideration when allocating and billing the customer.

Thanks