Message-ID: <16564840.1075840434387.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:27:55 -0700 (PDT) From: megan.parker@enron.com To: j..farmer@enron.com Subject: The Houston Expl Dec 2000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Parker, Megan X-To: Farmer, Daren J. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Farmer, Darren\Logistics X-Origin: FARMER-D X-FileName: darren farmer 6-26-02.pst Daren: I'm not sure if you can help me, but I have a Danny Conner deal from Decemb= er 2000 that has a price issue. =20 We were buying gas from The Houston Exploration Company on Black Marlin, Hi= gh Island 138/HPL meter 98663, deal 508426. The deal was priced at HSC - 0= .14. In December, a new platform came on, High Island 115/HPL meter 986431= . It did not start flowing until the 20th. Danny did not put a new deal i= n for this meter, so we combined the gas on deal 508426. The Houston Explo= ration thinks that the gas at HI 115 should be kept separate and priced at = HSC GD - 0.14 since it did not begin flowing until the 20th. We agree that= we received the gas. We have the pipeline statement from Black Marlin. W= e just don't have the same pricing. The Houston Exploration shows that we = owe them an additional $222k due to this price difference. We only purchas= ed this gas in Dec 2000 and Jan 2001. The deal for Jan, 547063, was priced= at GD - 0.14. Can you verify how this deal should be priced? I sent this= issue to Danny back in January and he said the IF price was correct, but T= he Houston Exploration is sticking to their price. If you need to talk to = their trader, his name is Lester Lipperdt 713-830-6960. Megan