Message-ID: <6197862.1075854323115.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 01:17:00 -0800 (PST)
From: bob.hall@enron.com
To: robert.superty@enron.com, katherine.kelly@enron.com, george.smith@enron.com, 
	victor.lamadrid@enron.com, rita.wynne@enron.com, 
	randall.gay@enron.com, patti.sullivan@enron.com, 
	edward.terry@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com
Subject: Ranks communication
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Bob M Hall
X-To: Robert Superty, Katherine L Kelly, George F Smith, Victor Lamadrid, Rita Wynne, Randall L Gay, Patti Sullivan, Edward Terry, Daren J Farmer
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Performance
X-Origin: Farmer-D
X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf

After getting your imput, I think this is the best:

We will only communicate Needs Improvement and Issues.  There will be 
differing messages for needs improvement which fit the situation - some need 
to hear that they are not performing at a high enought level relative to 
peers to help us achieve business goals or for them to be considered for a 
bonus (may need to finda another role within or outside Enron which is a 
better fit).  Message to someone new to Enron in that category should be 
different.  Glad they are here: believe that as they learn the organization 
and their job that they will be able to make significant contribution: doing 
the right thing to learn business, but that contributions to date are not 
significant enough to warrant payment of a bonus.

Let me know what you think.

thanks

bob