Message-ID: <8813835.1075854153479.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: pat.clynes@enron.com
Subject: Re: Meter #1552
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Daren J Farmer
X-To: Pat Clynes
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Farmer-D
X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf

Just a little explanation on what you're seeing.

 We have a swing deal at this point with Equistar, which allows them to take 
excess volumes over the base nom.  We have been estimating the overtakes each 
day at 15, 000.  However, because of limitations of the scheduling system, we 
can't nom the volumes estimated on the swing deal.  So, Equistar is within 
their rights and I am monitoring their activity, but the nom versus actual 
doesn't reflect this.  This occurs with a few of our industrial points.

D


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Pat Clynes @ ENRON                           08/14/2000 10:28 AM
	

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Meter #1552

Robert,
There is a large variance between noms and flow at this meter.  Is everyone 
in the loop on this.  Pat