Message-ID: <22410731.1075845124022.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:02:32 -0700 (PDT) From: j..farmer@enron.com To: mary.poorman@enron.com, sean.maki@enron.com Subject: RE: FW: King Ranch Balancing.xls Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Farmer, Daren J. X-To: Poorman, Mary , Maki, Sean X-cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ENRON X-bcc: X-Folder: \Farmer, Daren J.\Farmer, Daren J.\Sent Items X-Origin: FARMER-D X-FileName: Farmer, Daren J..pst Go ahead and adjust the deals to bring us in balance. What is the daily flow for the Saxet well now? D -----Original Message----- From: Poorman, Mary Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:31 PM To: Maki, Sean Cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ENRON Subject: Re: FW: King Ranch Balancing.xls In looking at the MTD prod. vs. nom numbers, we have consistently been under nominated by about 2,000/day at Three Rivers and 2,000/day at the Saxet well. We are making our imbalance worse, cumulative. We need to update our forward position and our nomination by 4,000/day to stay in balance to entitlements. Mary