Message-ID: <10095168.1075854345381.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 02:58:00 -0800 (PST) From: mjones7@txu.com To: kponton@duke-energy.com, cstone1@txu.com, ggreen2@txu.com, daren.j.farmer@enron.com, gary.a.hanks@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, earl.tisdale@enron.com, davila1@txu.com, liz.bellamy@enron.com, rskerik1@txu.com Subject: Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "Melissa Jones" X-To: "Eileen Ponton" , "Charlie Stone" , "Gary Green" , daren.j.farmer@enron.com, gary.a.hanks@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, earl.tisdale@enron.com, "David Avila" , Liz.Bellamy@enron.com, "Ronnie Skerik" X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Tufco X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf FYI - We agree with the 17.500 "Eileen Ponton" on 03/08/2001 11:51:38 AM To: Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities@TU cc: Subject: Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01 Have spoken w/ both gas controls (HPL/DEFS) and will agree with your 17,500. "Melissa Jones" To: "Eileen Ponton" , "Charlie Stone" com> bcc: 03/08/01 Subject: Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01 09:27 AM We disagree. We show 17.500, that was 0200 to 0900 @ 60 rate which equals 17.500 "Eileen Ponton" on 03/08/2001 10:56:39 AM To: David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM, LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM cc: Subject: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01 Per my gas control, Tufco went to 60,000 at midnight and reduced to 45,000 at 3:00 am due to PG&E having a compressor down. Nom rate calculated on 3 hrs at 60,000 and 6 hrs at 45,000. Please let me know if you have heard differently. DATE NOM FLOW - MCF FLOW - MMBTU 3/07 18,750 14,140 14,522 BTU = 1.027