Message-ID: <24189996.1075840451199.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mark.fisher@enron.com
To: tom.nemila@enron.com
Subject: WR627 Fault Paretos (May 2002)
Cc: jeff.duff@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: jeff.duff@enron.com
X-From: Mark Fisher
X-To: Tom Nemila
X-cc: Jeff Duff
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \mark fischer 7-12-02\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: FISCHER-M
X-FileName: mark fischer 7-12-02 LNotes.nsf

Tom, 

Here are the fault paretos of fault counts for all sites for May 2002 
(may2002paretos_faults.pdf). For readability only the top 30 faults for each 
site are displayed. Both Texas sites had VERY high numbers of "wind 
deviation" faults.

I am also attaching a file (from a different work request) that has a pareto 
(by site) of the mean number of faults per turbine (may2002mean_faults.pdf), 
which shows that the Texas sites have the highest mean faults per turbine. 
This also has boxplots of the number of faults by site to show the outliers.

I will do the June data, if still desired, when the data upload is completed.

As always, if you have questions or comments let me know.

Mark