Message-ID: <11311415.1075852371019.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:32:37 -0800 (PST)
From: m..forney@enron.com
To: joseph.wagner@enron.com, preston.ochsner@enron.com
Subject: Additional Load
Cc: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com
X-From: Forney, John M. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JFORNEY>
X-To: Wagner, Joseph </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jwagner2>, Ochsner, Preston </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pochsner>
X-cc: Gilbert-smith, Doug </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dsmith3>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \JFORNEY (Non-Privileged)\Forney, John M.\Sent Items
X-Origin: FORNEY-J
X-FileName: JFORNEY (Non-Privileged).pst



Thanks for the info for the additional load.      As I understand it,  we now have approximately 20 mw's in the South.  This is great!!
Each day I review balancing energy prices vs.  daily prices and the choice is extremely simple:    We allow the pool to fill this load.

I would recommend against buying any hedges against this power until further.     There is a good chance that prices occasionally go negative for offpeak/weekends and we want to take full advantage.

Do we need to discuss this further?   I just want to be on the same page.
Let me know what you think.

JMF