Message-ID: <16962050.1075861679498.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:03:19 -0800 (PST) From: m..forney@enron.com To: m..grace@enron.com, jeffrey.miller@enron.com Subject: FW: OOMC/OOME Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Forney, John M. X-To: Grace, Rebecca M. , Miller, Jeffrey X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JFORNEY (Non-Privileged)\Forney, John M.\Sent Items X-Origin: Forney-J X-FileName: JFORNEY (Non-Privileged).pst -- [Forney, John M.] It appears that Ercot is reversing their interpretation. We still need to dispute/collect for OOMC payments and also file under OOME heat rate provisions for all of the times that we ran when we were under OOMC. Does this make sense? JMF ---Original Message----- From: Twiggs, Thane Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:54 AM To: Forney, John M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Portz, David Cc: Yeung, Charles Subject: FW: OOMC/OOME FYI -----Original Message----- From: "Saathoff, Kent" @ENRON Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 2:58 PM To: Twiggs, Thane Cc: Walker, Mark; Adams, John Subject: RE: OOMC/OOME Thane, There must be some miscommunication. I just talked with John and he knows that an OOME instruction is necessary to get energy from OOMC capacity. It is not required by the protocols to bid in to balancing market as is Replacement. That causes us some operation problems and we may ask for that requirement to be applied to OOMC as well. Kent -----Original Message----- From: Twiggs, Thane Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:59 PM To: Saathoff, Kent Cc: Walker, Mark Subject: OOMC/OOME Importance: High I have a follow up question on our discussion at the TAC meeting last week. As we discussed, an OOMC instruction for hours 0-24 at 50MW would for example require a unit to be prepared to provide the 50MW, but not to actually provide the energy. Another unit specific instruction or OOME would be required for the unit to actually run at 50MW. As recent as this morning, we were told that ERCOT would provide us an OOME instruction when they want us to run after an OOMC instruction. However, they also said that we were operating outside the protocols due to John Adams' interpretation that when we receive an OOMC for a certain time period at a certain level we should be generating. We need immediate clarification on this issue. ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************