Message-ID: <2723099.1075861679520.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:14:11 -0800 (PST) From: m..forney@enron.com To: gary.bryan@enron.com Subject: RE: Austin Energy - Sand Hills Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Forney, John M. X-To: Bryan, Gary X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JFORNEY (Non-Privileged)\Forney, John M.\Sent Items X-Origin: Forney-J X-FileName: JFORNEY (Non-Privileged).pst The instantaneous supply in the form of ancillary services was supposed to be provided to us by COA. The contract was not specific concerning the intraday gas supply, or how we would schedule intraday power. COA wants us to "split the meter" at the plant, allowing us to schedule our own 100 mw's ( and assume all liability) and also arrange our own gas agreement. Otherwise, they dont want to allow us intraday capability. The agreement doesnt expire until Nov 3, 2003. Their would be two gas contracts to consider, I suppose: Enron needs to contract for their own supply for this plant and also wants to sell to COA directly. When do you want to talk? JMF -----Original Message----- From: Bryan, Gary Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:13 AM To: Forney, John M. Subject: Austin Energy - Sand Hills We need to talk about instantaneous supply and how it is dealt with under your Sand Hills contract. The contract I am working on with Austin really doesn't address this issue and in order for me to include this in the contract we will need to talk. I have a call in also with Lonestar to talk about this as well. I have Janet Wallis helping me address some of these issues. We may want to schedule a meeting to include her also. Let me know where we stand.