Message-ID: <3594309.1075842545979.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:39:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: barbara.gray@enron.com
Subject: Federal lands issues for Energy Policy Debate
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Barbara N Gray
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: FOSSUM-D
X-FileName: dfossum.nsf

Barbara:  in case my voice mails didn't make sense, see the final section of 
Shelley's paper on valuation.  ETS is working through INGAA to push in a 
direction that is inconsistent with where Paul and Mark were hoping BLM will 
go.  DF
--------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/12/2001 11:37 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           03/12/2001 07:06 AM
	

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron
cc:  

Subject: Federal lands issues for Energy Policy Debate

For your info-  MK
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron on 03/12/2001 
07:05 AM ---------------------------
From: Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/09/2001 05:26 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rob 
Wilson/ENRON@enronXgate, Beth Jensen/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Federal lands issues for Energy Policy Debate



Attached is a paper that I prepared for INGAA on federal and Tribal lands 
issues.  On the ROW valuation issue, I know we face similar trends for state 
granted ROW.