Message-ID: <17417619.1075842557448.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:43:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: bob.chandler@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com
Subject: Re: Mavrix -- Revised
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Bob Chandler, Susan Scott
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: FOSSUM-D
X-FileName: dfossum.nsf

Its my understanding that the plan is to have it be a sub of EPC (or whatever 
the name of the parent of TW and NN  is these days).  I thought it had been 
moved already, but apparently not.  Susan, whats the status?  df


   
	
	
	From:  Bob Chandler                           02/01/2001 06:12 PM
	

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Mavrix -- Revised


Username:  secretariat
Password:  c0rpsec                                      that is a zero in the 
password
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron on 02/01/2001 
06:12 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Bob Chandler                           02/01/2001 06:08 PM
	

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  (bcc: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron)

Subject: Mavrix


Don't know why I didn't think to look in Secretariat:

http://home.enron.com:84/secretariat/CDS12547.htm


It's currently a sub of Transwestern Pipeline Company.   Is this the best 
positioning for legal/regulatory purposes?  I liked your idea, Drew, of 
having it be a sub of Enron Pipeline Company.

If it's a sub of TW, it'll get disclosed in the TW Form 2.  I don't know 
whether that's a concern for you.