Subject: RE: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 03:18:00 -0800 (PST)

The author was obviously not aware that the Enron pipelines pride themselves 
in having standardized our "operational nuisances" !!  df

From: Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/22/2001 03:10 PM
To: Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert 
Kilmer/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ray 
Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan 
Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Frazier King/ENRON@enronXgate, Dari 
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: RE: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief

 This brief is not very well written -- many legal mistakes and grammar is 
also really poor.  Here are my questions and 
 comments.  I did, however, enjoy reading about "the unique operational 
nuisances of every interstate pipeline".

 --Dot

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Corman, Shelley  
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 8:09 AM
To: Fossum, Drew; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; McCoppin, Dorothy; 
Place, Janet; Neppl, Ray; Pavlou, Maria; Scott, Susan; King Jr., Frazier; 
Dornan, Dari; Huber, Lee
Subject: FW: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief

Last brief draft for now!
 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Susan Moore" <[email-masked]>@ENRON 
[mailto:[email-masked]
om] 
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 5:12 PM
To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; John Burnes; Paul 
Korman; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief

Attached is the initial draft of the NGA Section 5 argument for the pipeline 
petitioners' joint brief opposing segmentation.

I have attached the document in both Word and WordPerfect.  The document was 
converted into WordPerfect from Word, which should explain any WordPerfect 
formatting problems.

The Statement of the Case for the segmentation brief will be circulated on 
Tuesday morning.

Susan A. Moore
Associate
Van Ness Feldman, P.C.
202-298-1896

 - VANDOC_98238_1.DOC << File: VANDOC_98238_1.DOC >> 
 - VANDOC_98421_1.WPD << File: VANDOC_98421_1.WPD >>