Message-ID: <24731257.1075859032420.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: tracy.geaccone@enron.com
To: caroline.barnes@enron.com
Subject: RE: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern
 Pipeline Co.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Geaccone, Tracy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TGEACCO>
X-To: Barnes, Caroline </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cbarnes>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \TGEACCO (Non-Privileged)\Geaccone, Tracy\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Geaccone-T
X-FileName: TGEACCO (Non-Privileged).pst

We need to input as planned originally, assuming Steve will hold those costs flat.   Danny needs to understand that this is a $350,000 in EOL charges.  I would not discuss the rest of the EIS with Danny.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnes, Caroline  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.

Here is a spreadsheet I have put together to show the 2001 budget vs the 2002 budget.  Steve Hotte will be getting with Danny and ENW on the charges.  We will be inputting the ENW numbers into Adaytum, and will change once Steve has had a chance to renegotiate.   cvb  

 << File: EIS 2002 ETS Allocation.xls >> 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:15 PM
To:	Barnes, Caroline
Subject:	RE: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.

Do we really have a choice on EOL.  What is the total cost for ETS compared to what we orginally had in 2002?  I need to discuss with Danny.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnes, Caroline  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.

We have this line on the functional income statement and are handling it.  Please note that the costs have more than doubled and Steve Hotte is preparing to discuss with ENW as to why?  TW EOL charge is $113291 for 2002.  Will Steve Harris want to continue using EOL for that amount??  Since you should have put $35,000 in commercial for EOL, I am reflecting the difference in the ENW line.  cvb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:09 PM
To:	Barnes, Caroline
Subject:	FW: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.

I assume you are handling for all of ETS?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yparraguirre, Jay  
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Barnes, Caroline
Subject:	2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.

Attached is the updated version of the 2002 plan assessments from ENW for your business unit.  This intercompany billing invoice now includes pass throughs.  Consistent with 2001, pass through billings (long distance, market data, WAN, etc.) will not be included in the standard assessments ("8xxxxxxx" accounts).  They will be posted directly to direct expenses ("5xxxxxxx" accounts) at the cost center level.  This pass through number is only a high level place holder and is not intended to replace the dollars already being budgeted for by each cost center owner.

If you have any questions, you can contact Kevin May at x52508 and he will answer any questions or direct you to the correct person.

If you are not the correct person to receive these assessments or if there is someone else that you would like to include in this process, please reply back to me with this information and I will add them to the contact list for future correspondence.

Thanks,

Jay
x53813

 << File: ETS - Transwestern IC 0914.xls >>