Message-ID: <13806464.1075859032803.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:16:25 -0700 (PDT) From: tracy.geaccone@enron.com To: rod.hayslett@enron.com Subject: RE: Transwestern Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Geaccone, Tracy X-To: Hayslett, Rod X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \TGEACCO (Non-Privileged)\Geaccone, Tracy\Deleted Items X-Origin: Geaccone-T X-FileName: TGEACCO (Non-Privileged).pst Numbers are good. -----Original Message----- From: Hayslett, Rod Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:09 PM To: Geaccone, Tracy Subject: FW: Transwestern Can you verify the data on the %'s? -----Original Message----- From: McCarty, Danny Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:03 PM To: Hayslett, Rod; Harris, Steven Cc: Geaccone, Tracy Subject: RE: Transwestern Rod, I'm a bit unclear as to the source of the information contained in the first two sentences of paragraph 2. I think that they should more accurately be worded, "TW benefits from contractual commitments for its firm transportation contracts into California, contracts covering 86% of TW's capacity to California continue through 2005. Long term risk is mitigated by contracts covering 40% of TW's capacity post 2005, and a settlement agreement with current firm customers." This would reflect our position inclusive of Red Rock. I'm not sure where their numbers on expiring contracts came from, but I wouldn't have a problem documenting these. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Hayslett, Rod Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:34 AM To: McCarty, Danny; Harris, Steven Cc: Geaccone, Tracy Subject: FW: Transwestern Importance: High Please review and get back to me asap. Rod Hayslett EB4054 713-853-6178