Message-ID: <23718083.1075853738833.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:51:00 -0800 (PST)
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: judy.townsend@enron.com
Subject: Storage Demand Issue
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Chris Germany
X-To: Judy Townsend
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Germany-C
X-FileName: cgerman.nsf

We know about this don't we Judith!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 06:51 
PM ---------------------------


Brenda H Fletcher
01/12/2000 09:19 AM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan 
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Storage Demand Issue

FYI - You may already be aware of this but I'm passing this on in case you 
didn't know this.

BF

 ---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 09:08 
AM ---------------------------
From: Dave Nommensen on 01/10/2000 02:02 PM
To: Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Storage Demand Issue  

Storage deals require a meter on both the injection side and the withdrawal 
side in order to bridge - even if there is only a demand charge.
A zone is not enough, it must have a meter.  Let me know if that works.

d.n.


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Jeff Coates                           01/10/2000 01:52 PM
	

To: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Storage Demand Issue  

The deal was entered on friday 1/7,  and your right it never bridged over to 
Unify.  I don't understand the location question,
the deal was set up like all other storage tickets.  I'm just trying to get 
the demand to download so VM can draft it.