Message-ID: <10098842.1075848309665.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 07:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: edith.cross@enron.com
To: mike.curry@enron.com, doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com
Subject: Annual Wind Volumes
Cc: berney.aucoin@enron.com, greg.trefz@enron.com, jason.wiesepape@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: berney.aucoin@enron.com, greg.trefz@enron.com, jason.wiesepape@enron.com
X-From: Edith Cross
X-To: Mike Curry, Doug Gilbert-Smith
X-cc: Berney C Aucoin, Greg Trefz, Jason R Wiesepape
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Doug_Gilbert_Smith_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: GILBERTSMITH-D
X-FileName: dsmith.nsf

I know Wiese has already talked to each of you about this, but I wanted to 
make sure both of you understand the REC situation for Green Mountain.  Using 
the current load profile, here is a summary of the annual mwhrs (and REC's) 
we are obligated to deliver to Green Mountain:




If the plant comes on line by 11/1/2001, and there is still a 75 MW 
transmission constraint, Enron Wind is contractually obligated to sell the 
following quantities in 2001:

 Nov-01  29,160
 Dec-01  27,396
 Total for 2001 56,556

If all transmission constraints are removed prior to 2002, the most Enron 
Wind is obligated to provide is 475,000 credits.  Therefore, we will 
definitely be short REC's in 2002.  The current pricing model assumes that we 
will only receive 360,000 REC's in 2002 (75 MW constraint exists for the 
entire year).  Any incremental REC's are purchased at $3.50 for both years.  

E