Message-ID: <12171778.1075840540394.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:17:01 -0800 (PST) From: careed@aep.com To: susan_j_neel@reliantenergy.com Subject: RE: 824 Readiness Survey Cc: schrab@enron.com, heidi.schrab@greenmountain.com, teel@enron.com, jennifer.teel@ec-power.com, mkboyd@aep.com, set@ercot.com, slmckain@aep.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: schrab@enron.com, heidi.schrab@greenmountain.com, teel@enron.com, jennifer.teel@ec-power.com, mkboyd@aep.com, set@ercot.com, slmckain@aep.com X-From: careed@aep.com@ENRON X-To: susan_j_neel@reliantenergy.com X-cc: Schrab, Heidi , Teel, Jennifer , Mark Boyd (E-mail) , set@ercot.com, Shelly McKain (E-mail) X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Gilbert-smith, Doug\Deleted Items X-Origin: GILBERTSMITH-D X-FileName: doug gilbert smith 6-25-02.PST I think the confusion begins with the fact that the contingency plan was developed before the 824 work group met to develop the plan. Don Bender worked on the contingency plan and will bring this issue up at the RMS meeting tomorrow. Cary Reed Sr Business Standards Consultant 918 594 4026 audinet 700-4026 susan_j_neel@reliantenergy.com 01/08/02 09:43 AM To: "Teel, Jennifer" cc: "'careed@aep.com'" , "Schrab, Heidi" , "Mark Boyd (E-mail)" , set@ercot.com, "Shelly McKain (E-mail)" Subject: RE: 824 Readiness Survey I agree that the Contingency Plan will need to be updated if this change control is approved. "Teel, Jennifer" cc: "Shelly McKain (E-mail)" , "Mark Boyd (E-mail)" 01/08/02 09:35 AM , "'careed@aep.com'" , "Schrab, Heidi" Subject: RE: 824 Readiness Survey I have a clarification question. As I understand this question relates to change control #2001-232 which is to have all 824's for 867's go point-to-point instead of thru ERCOT. The notes say that it is hoped that this process will be implemented by mid-January. In some of the last notes I saw from the RMS 867 Contigency Plan - the plan referenced that 824's for 867 rejects would go to ERCOT but 824's for duplicates would not. It seems the two are in conflict. When the change control gets implemented - is the plan to update the 867 Contigency plan so that no 824's will go to ERCOT. In developing our systems we are trying to determine if all 824's will be point-to-point in the future. Thanks for any clarification. Jennifer -----Original Message----- From: careed@aep.com [mailto:careed@aep.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:28 AM To: Schrab, Heidi Cc: set@ercot.com Subject: Re: 824 Readiness Survey So far, we have only heard from ESG and Reliant regarding their readiness. Cary Reed Sr Business Standards Consultant 918 594 4026 audinet 700-4026 "Schrab, Heidi" To: cc: 01/03/02 09:33 PM Subject: 824 Readiness Survey Please respond to Cary (careed@aep.com) and me, the results will be announced on the change control call next week. Thanks - Heidi TDSPs: when will you be able to receive 824s direct from the CRs? CRs: when will you be able to send 824s direct to the TDSPs?