Message-ID: <1319508.1075852417287.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: sachin.gandhi@enron.com
To: john.griffith@enron.com
Subject: RE: Temps
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Gandhi, Sachin </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SGANDHI>
X-To: Griffith, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jgriffit>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \JGRIFFIT (Non-Privileged)\Griffith, John\Fundamentals
X-Origin: GRIFFITH-J
X-FileName: JGRIFFIT (Non-Privileged).pst

John,

The reason they are high is because they are not population weighted.  This makes a significant difference, looking at 10 cities at 100% versus population weighted, where all of the cities in a region add up to 100%.

If you would like me to weight them, it would not be a problem.

Sachin


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John  
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 4:48 PM
To:	Gandhi, Sachin
Subject:	RE: Temps

Sachin,

These HDD's look a little too high.  I pulled just 5 cities and they are more than the spreadsheet that you prepared for the fundy's site.  Could you look at them to verify.  Thanks.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gandhi, Sachin  
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 4:06 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	Temps

sorry for the delay, the data was not as clean as i originally thought.  let me know if you need anything else.

sachin

 << File: easttemps.xls >>