Message-ID: <29746373.1075840707514.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 01:40:00 -0800 (PST)
From: bill.iii@enron.com
To: portland.shift@enron.com
Subject: CTPY Name Change
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Bill Williams III
X-To: Portland Shift
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \mark guzman 6-28-02\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: GUZMAN-M
X-FileName: mark guzman 6-28-02.nsf

This is probably good for everyone to see...check it out.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 03/15/2001 
09:42 AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                03/15/2001 08:51 AM

To: Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT 

Subject: CTPY Name Change

Another trivial counterparty name change - it's Enmax Energy Corp., not just 
plain old Enmax Corp. These deals have been changed.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/15/2001 08:52 AM 
---------------------------
To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Re: Enmax  

Rhonda,

You are correct!



Rhonda L Denton@ECT
03/14/2001 03:40 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Enmax

540039, 541695, 541715, and 541737 are booked to Enmax Corporation.  I think 
they should be booked to Enmax Energy Corporation.  Wendy Conwell in credit 
has prepared a credit work sheet on this CP so I believe this is the correct 
entity.  Can you check?