Subject: Re: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:48:00 -0800 (PST)

Joe Hartsoe -

My understanding is that Hebert doesn't have the legal authority (and the 
filing never makes clear) to Suspend performance under the PPA (he probably 
doesn't have the political support for this either).

EPSA, however, could support this in its filing as a method to help move the 
QF issue forward.

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/20/2001 10:04 AM
		 
		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary 
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda 
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard 
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

FYI.  Any thoughts Joe & Co.? Is release from contracts an "increase supply" 
option?  My fear is that QFs get released and then California's "police 
state" mentality kicks in, enacting Exec Orders, legislation, etc. to ensure 
that the power from the QF facilities stays in California.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 10:00 AM -----

	Chris H Foster@ECT
	03/20/2001 07:30 AM
		 
		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff 
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

We are trying to set up energy purchasing arrangements with QFs who get 
temporarily released from their contracts.  Take a look at the e-mail below 
and see if we can suport them.

Thanks

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 
05:26 AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  "Short, Bill" <[email-masked]>                           
03/19/2001 03:59 PM

To: "Michael Davis (E-mail)" <[email-masked]>, "Frank Eckhart 
(E-mail)" <[email-masked]>, "Steve B. Van Leer (E-mail)"  
<[email-masked]>, "Doug Fernley (E-mail)"  
<[email-masked]>, "Chris H. Foster (E-mail)"  
<[email-masked]>, "Jack Pyburn (E-mail)"  <[email-masked]>, 
"Mark Thompson (E-mail)"  <[email-masked]>, "Marvin (\"Trip\") 
K. Ballard (E-mail)"  <[email-masked]>, "Shawn Nichols 
(E-mail)"  <[email-masked]>, "Kyle T. Hoffman (E-mail)"  
<[email-masked]>
cc: "Bahrs, John" <[email-masked]>, "Gulino, Dan"  
<[email-masked]>, "Holmes, Randy"  <[email-masked]>, 
"Kawash, David"  <[email-masked]>, "Naunton, Chris"  
<[email-masked]>, "Quinn, Marty"  <[email-masked]> 
Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

 <<Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC>>  <<RIDGEWOOD
_REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC>>

Gentlemen,

In light of the possible backouts in California today and later this week,
if it is possible, Ridgewood Power requests that your organization intervene
in support of the attached emergency filing at the FERC.  Please send this
e-mail to your firm's general counsel and ask him to contact either our
Washington counsel, Carol Smoots (202-496-7196), our general counsel, Dan
Gulino (800-331-8006, x-118) or me at (800-331-8006, x-163).  Any help would
be most appreciated.

Sincerely yours,

Bill Short

 - Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC
 - RIDGEWOOD _REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC