Subject: WP-02 Data Request
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 05:15:00 -0800 (PST)

Paul,
I am working with Ray Kindley on this matter.   I am replying for PGP and
it's members who are parties to the rate case, including Seattle City Light.

We received a hard copy of your three data requests regarding the Joint
Customer Testimony on either Saturday, March 10th or Monday, March 12th.  We
failed to date stamp initially, which is why I am not sure which day we
received it.  Today, I received amended versions of those data requests.
Because of the confusion I intend to respond only to the amended version on
Tuesday, March 20th, which splits the difference between the initial and the
amended version due dates.  Please let me know if there is any problem with
handling the responses in this manner.  Thank you in advance for your
courtsey.

Jay T. Waldron
[email-masked]

Kelly C. Beniga
kbeniga @ schwabe.com
(503) 796-2445

NOTICE:  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential 
information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may 
have received this communication in error,  please reply to the sender 
indicating that fact and delete the copy you received.  In addition, you 
should not print, copy,  retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the 
information.       Thank you.