Message-ID: <16071256.1075858863885.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:38:57 -0800 (PST)
From: shelley.corman@enron.com
To: danny.mccarty@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com
Subject:  PG&E 2001 Capacity Release Transactions on Transwestern Pipeline
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Corman, Shelley </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SCORMAN>
X-To: McCarty, Danny </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dmccarty>, Harris, Steven </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sharris1>, Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kwatson>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \SHARRIS1 (Non-Privileged)\Harris, Steven\Inbox
X-Origin: Harris-S
X-FileName: SHARRIS1 (Non-Privileged).pst


FYI

While I have been periodically giving updates on the above max rate capacity release activity, I was surprised by the magnitude of the PG&E value above max. rates.
For the 12 months ended 9/30/01 we had net cash payments to PG&E.  (approx $18 mil revenues to Cal.  + $5.6 revenue on San Juan - $28 million in above max rate capacity release activity = ($4.4) million