Subject: RE: Management rep letter update
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 06:20:00 -0800 (PST)

Jim,

	I do not recall the company ever agreeing to the $41.9MM value.  The company did accept an earlier valuation prepared
	by Landrum of $26.5MM.  The estimated increase of $3.2MM is high; an estimated increase of $2.0MM should be adequate.

	Tom   713-993-5604 

-----Original Message-----
From: Saunders, James 
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Meers, Thomas; Meers, Thomas; Hayslett, Rod
Subject: FW: Management rep letter update

fyi - okay w revisions to #3 and #4?  #3 reiterates that we administratively agreed to a $41.9mm value.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked]
[mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:56 PM
To: Saunders, James
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Management rep letter update

Jim - Left you a voicemail.  I have to run to a 1 pm meeting.  We will need
to get a mgmt rep when all this is over since the financials will be
refiled and encorporated into EOTTs filings.

Please look over.  The underlines mean the text is new to the rep letters
you have signed in the past, but it is text that is simply copied and
pasted from the SEC responses.  The highlighted item is as such because we
need to verify if the statement is still correct.

(See attached file: Mgmt Rep Update EGP 8K2.doc)
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.