Message-ID: <24166033.1075854910449.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 14:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: diane.anderson@enron.com
To: stephanie.panus@enron.com, susan.bailey@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, 
	marie.heard@enron.com
Subject: ? re: Bankers Trust/ Deutsche Bank
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Anderson, Diane </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DANDERS2>
X-To: Panus, Stephanie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Spanus>, Bailey, Susan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sbaile2>, Jones, Tana </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tjones>, Heard, Marie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mheard>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MHEARD (Non-Privileged)\Heard, Marie\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Heard-M
X-FileName: MHEARD (Non-Privileged).pst

Howdy.  Can one of you guys remind me where we stand with this sort-of merged counterparty?
Last I recall while DB had bought BT, BT was still allowed to transact in its name - because we
hadn't yet renegotiated an ISDA for the combined entity.  Is that still where we stand?  

HELP!!!! 

:)  

Diane