Message-ID: <6392641.1075854921915.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:50:33 -0700 (PDT) From: marie.heard@enron.com To: joanne.rozycki@enron.com Subject: RE: What do you think? Should we just respond to Ellen Su? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Heard, Marie X-To: Rozycki, Joanne X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MHEARD (Non-Privileged)\Heard, Marie\Sent Items X-Origin: Heard-M X-FileName: MHEARD (Non-Privileged).pst I'll take a look at it and run it by one of the other lawyers. -----Original Message----- From: Rozycki, Joanne Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:49 PM To: Heard, Marie Subject: What do you think? Should we just respond to Ellen Su? -----Original Message----- From: RSagebi@genre.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-RSagebi+40genre+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:42 PM To: Shackleton, Sara; Su, Ellen Subject: ENRON NA Amendment Sara and Ellen, Attached below is a draft of the second amendment that we propose make to the ISDA Master Agreement dated as of February 1, 1994 between General Re Financial Products Corp. and Enron North America Corp. The purpose of the amendment is to eliminate the break language from the ISDA Master that we added under the first amendment agreement. Don Welstead in our Credit Department asked me to forward this to you in April, but I think that I failed to follow up on the assignment. Please review the draft and revert to me with any comments that you might have. I can be reached at any time at Telephone: (212) 541-2561 / Facsimile: (212) 541-2549 or via return e-mail. Thanks a lot, Rene (See attached file: Amd1214(II).DOC) - Amd1214(II).DOC << File: Amd1214(II).DOC >>