Message-ID: <31314114.1075861585591.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 05:26:45 -0800 (PST) From: tanya.rohauer@enron.com To: t..hodge@enron.com Subject: RE: FW: lc format Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Rohauer, Tanya X-To: Hodge, Jeffrey T. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JHODGE (Non-Privileged)\Hodge, Jeffrey T.\Inbox X-Origin: Hodge-J X-FileName: JHODGE (Non-Privileged).pst Please have him explain his rationale for deleting these two items as they seem beneficial to whichever party must draw. Thanks, Tanya -----Original Message----- From: Hodge, Jeffrey T. Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:18 PM To: Rohauer, Tanya Subject: FW: FW: lc format Tanya: Let me know your thoughts on the changes they have proposed. I am a little concerned by what they have deleted, but know we really would like to get this done. Thanks, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: "Joseph Forbes" @ENRON Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:11 PM To: Hodge, Jeffrey T. Subject: Re: FW: lc format Jeff, here are my comments to the LC. If this is acceptable we will go ahead and execute the Agreement. Thank you for your help in getting this in place. Joe (See attached file: ENA-DETM LC.doc) - ENA-DETM LC.doc << File: ENA-DETM LC.doc >>