Message-ID: <6096957.1075852800091.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 15:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: w..cantrell@enron.com
To: ray.alvarez@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, robert.frank@enron.com, 
	scott.gahn@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, 
	leslie.lawner@enron.com, dave.perrino@enron.com, 
	greg.sharp@enron.com, kristann.shireman@enron.com, 
	matt.smith@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com, scott.stoness@enron.com, 
	jennifer.thome@enron.com, steve.walton@enron.com, k..allen@enron.com, 
	don.black@enron.com, suzanne.calcagno@enron.com, 
	mark.courtney@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, 
	frank.ermis@enron.com, donna.fulton@enron.com, l..gay@enron.com, 
	mike.grigsby@enron.com, p..hewitt@enron.com, keith.holst@enron.com, 
	paul.kaufman@enron.com, tori.kuykendall@enron.com, 
	susan.mara@enron.com, ed.mcmichael@enron.com, 
	stephanie.miller@enron.com, l..nicolay@enron.com, 
	matt.smith@enron.com, patti.sullivan@enron.com, 
	robert.superty@enron.com, m..tholt@enron.com, 
	barry.tycholiz@enron.com
Subject: PLEASE RESPOND BY FRIDAY, 10/5 -- El Paso Comments RP00-336
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Cantrell, Rebecca W. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BCANTRE>
X-To: Alvarez, Ray </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ralvare2>, Comnes, Alan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Acomnes>, Frank, Robert </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rfrank>, Gahn, Scott </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=376a758b-187970b9-862564c2-546fc0>, Kingerski, Harry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Hkingers>, Lawner, Leslie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Llawner>, Perrino, Dave </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dperrino>, Sharp, Greg </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=e864898d-7132e90-86256915-75dd8d>, Shireman, Kristann </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kshirema>, Smith, Matt </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Msmith18>, Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jsteffe>, Stoness, Scott </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sstoness>, Thome, Jennifer </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jthome>, Walton, Steve </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Swalto2>, Allen, Phillip K. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pallen>, Black, Don </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dblack>, Calcagno, Suzanne </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Scalcagn>, Courtney, Mark </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=7374189d-25d32f14-8625697e-4dfa7a>, Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jdasovic>, Ermis, Frank </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Fermis>, Fulton, Donna </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dfulton>, Gay, Randall L. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rgay>, Grigsby, Mike </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mgrigsb>, Hewitt, Jess P. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jhewitt>, Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kholst>, Kaufman, Paul </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pkaufma>, Kuykendall, Tori </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tkuyken>, Mara, Susan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Smara>, McMichael Jr., Ed </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Emcmich>, Miller, Stephanie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Smiller2>, Nicolay, Christi L. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cnicola>, Smith, Matt </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Msmith18>, Sullivan, Patti </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Psulliv>, Superty, Robert </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rsupert>, Tholt, Jane M. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jtholt>, Tycholiz, Barry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Btychol>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \KHOLST (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Holst-K
X-FileName: KHOLST (Non-Privileged).pst

Please review the attached filing and provide any comments you may have by COB Friday, 10/5.  

The filing is ENA's comments on El Paso's proposal for receipt point allocation, focusing on discussions at the two technical conferences in the proceeding.  Also, it may be that, based on further discussion with certain other shippers, we will modify our statement in Item No. 1 to to support a different version of the method for allocating receipt point rights, but only if there is strong opposition to our method.  We don't want FERC to select the method that El Paso proposed originally.