Message-ID: <29708433.1075844963248.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: stanley.horton@enron.com
To: susan.ralph@enron.com
Subject: Re: environmental insurance for EOTT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Stanley Horton
X-To: Susan Ralph
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Stanley_Horton_2\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HORTON-S
X-FileName: shorton.nsf

30 days is acceptable.  This is extremely important to us.




Susan Ralph@EOTT
04/27/2001 02:17 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lawrence 
Clayton/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: environmental insurance for EOTT

You asked for a time line on securing this quote.  

I have already discussed the general concept with Marsh Mac and a bit of 
strategy on how we would approach this with AIG.  

Lou,  I need you to give me the data that we have available on these lines.  
As I mentioned to you, I want to go to the carrier  with what I have to offer 
them instead of them dictating to me what they want.   Until I get this I am 
strictly talking in a vacuum and can get nothing moving forward.  

After that, I would think that I could have a quote from them within 30 
days..I will shoot for better than that.  I feel however that this quote/due 
diligence will be much more intensive on their part  given their experience 
with EOTT,  I can definitely ask for an answer within a specified time 
frame.  Is 30 days acceptable? 

 Hope this answers your questions.  If not please let me know.