Message-ID: <23253629.1075844987678.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 10:49:00 -0700 (PDT) From: stanley.horton@enron.com To: susan.ralph@enron.com Subject: Re: environmental insurance for EOTT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Stanley Horton X-To: Susan Ralph X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Stanley_Horton_June2001\Sent Items X-Origin: HORTON-S X-FileName: shorton.pst 30 days is acceptable. This is extremely important to us. Susan Ralph@EOTT 04/27/2001 02:17 PM To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lawrence Clayton/Houston/Eott@Eott cc: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: environmental insurance for EOTT You asked for a time line on securing this quote. I have already discussed the general concept with Marsh Mac and a bit of strategy on how we would approach this with AIG. Lou, I need you to give me the data that we have available on these lines. As I mentioned to you, I want to go to the carrier with what I have to offer them instead of them dictating to me what they want. Until I get this I am strictly talking in a vacuum and can get nothing moving forward. After that, I would think that I could have a quote from them within 30 days..I will shoot for better than that. I feel however that this quote/due diligence will be much more intensive on their part given their experience with EOTT, I can definitely ask for an answer within a specified time frame. Is 30 days acceptable? Hope this answers your questions. If not please let me know.