Message-ID: <16821725.1075860880135.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:11:00 -0800 (PST) From: jeffery.fawcett@enron.com To: steve@apiweb.com Subject: Belen NM - Cogeneration Cc: eric.faucheaux@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: eric.faucheaux@enron.com X-From: Jeffery Fawcett X-To: steve X-cc: Eric Faucheaux X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kevin_Hyatt_Mar2002\Hyatt, Kevin\Projects X-Origin: Hyatt-K X-FileName: khyatt (Non-Privileged).pst Steve, In addition to Eric's questions below, I have an even more fundamental question, are the two scenarios (3 frame 6's, 2 frame 7's) additive or cummulative? In other words, are we looking at planning on 130,000 lb/hr or 190,000 lb/hr? Obviously, all these considerations make a difference in terms of design/cost. ---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 02/02/2001 11:09 AM --------------------------- Eric Faucheaux 02/02/2001 10:53 AM To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Belen NM - Cogeneration Regarding the information that was provided from Steve Rutherford/API, please answer or have answered the following questions that are presented below: RE: Maximum pressure and volume ".... initially 3xGE 6B - 60,000 lb/h (aprx. =31MMcfd) @ 350 psig." - is 60,000 lb/h for each unit or times 3 for total of 180,000 lb/h? - is 60,000 lb/h rate the sum of 3 GE 6B volumes and is this maximum the hourly rate not a sum divided by 24 hr? - what is minimum turndown flow rate? RE: Maximum pressure and volume ".... future possible 2xGE 7FA - 130,000 lb/h (aprx. =68MMcfd) @ 500 psig." - is the 130,000 lb/h incremental to the 60,000 lb/hr for 3xGE6B or is 130,000lb/hr the new total? - is 130,000 lb/h for each unit or times 2 for total of 260,000 lb/h? - is 130,000 lb/h rate the sum of 2 GE 7FA volumes and is this maximum the hourly rate not a sum divided by 24 hr? - what is minimum turndown flow rate?