Message-ID: <12247261.1075860881922.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:25:32 -0700 (PDT) From: john.shafer@enron.com To: kevin.hyatt@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com Subject: RE: Project Sun Devil EIS Cc: william.kendrick@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bcc: william.kendrick@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com X-From: Shafer, John X-To: Hyatt, Kevin , Campbell, Larry X-cc: Kendrick, William , Soldano, Louis X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kevin_Hyatt_Mar2002\Hyatt, Kevin\Projects\Sun Devil X-Origin: Hyatt-K X-FileName: khyatt (Non-Privileged).pst Kevin, I am still working with the Arizona Chapter of TNC to get the information I= was looking for. However, preliminary talks is that there are no show-sto= ppers from the environmental community at this point. There will be some s= ensitive issues, but we can work through them. On a project of this magnit= ude (400 miles, with about 200 of it greenfield) an environmental strategy = should be developed which would probably include some early scoping meeting= s to assess public and landowner input. I would suggest that you consider = having a Third Party do the EIS for the FERC Staff (it is much faster that = way as the FERC does not have to dedicate staff to a major filing). Also, = have you thought about whether or not we would want to go to the FERC early= and solicit their involvement up-front to expedite and streamline the proc= essing? I am assuming that Rob Kilmer will be in charge of putting the app= lication together since he has assumed the TW work from Mark Kay Miller (at= least that is what I have been told)? I would also suggest that you think= about enlisting the input from the Public Relations folks (i.e., Gina Tayl= or). =20 -----Original Message----- From: =09Hyatt, Kevin =20 Sent:=09Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:55 AM To:=09Campbell, Larry Cc:=09Shafer, John; Kendrick, William Subject:=09Project Sun Devil EIS Importance:=09High I received the vmail from Bill last week basically stating there were no en= vironmental deal killers for this new gas pipeline project, at least not fr= om a 30,000 foot high level survey. =20 My question is now what are our next steps? I am building a work order aut= horization for some minimal dollars to get things like the ROW, EIS, etc. s= coped out. Assuming we have necessary market support, what would it cost t= o move to the next level on the EIS? What do we get for our money? I am m= ostly concerned about the "greenfield" portion of the line that would run f= rom Flagstaff to Phoenix. =20 Please call me at your earliest convenience to discuss an action plan. thanks Kevin Hyatt 713-853-5559