Message-ID: <27137131.1075860883651.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:37:32 -0700 (PDT) From: spatti@ensr.com To: john.shafer@enron.com, kevin.hyatt@enron.com, eric.gadd@enron.com Subject: Land Use Categories and Constraints along the proposed Sun Devil Route Cc: jon.schmidt@enron.com, gina.taylor@enron.com, doug.cebryk@enron.com, jon.alstad@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: jon.schmidt@enron.com, gina.taylor@enron.com, doug.cebryk@enron.com, jon.alstad@enron.com X-From: Patti, Scott X-To: Shafer, John , Hyatt, Kevin , Gadd, Eric X-cc: Schmidt, Jon , Taylor, Gina , Cebryk, Doug , Alstad, Jon X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kevin_Hyatt_Mar2002\Hyatt, Kevin\Projects\Sun Devil X-Origin: Hyatt-K X-FileName: khyatt (Non-Privileged).pst Attached is the land use category and constraint table that Jon Alstad has put together for the currently proposed route. He and I both have been working on the briefing report (fatal flaw analysis), and this will be another part of it. The text in the briefing report is not fully fleshed out and coherent at this point, primarily due to the unforeseen brush fires we've been putting out all week on the Red Rock project. We hope to have it fleshed out and coherent on Monday. Please call with any questions. Scott Scott J. Patti Senior Project Manager ENSR International 1601 Prospect Parkway Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone: (970) 493-8878 Fax: (970) 493-0213 Email: spatti@ensr.com -----Original Message----- From: Patti, Scott Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:06 PM To: 'Shafer, John'; 'Hyatt, Kevin'; 'Gadd, Eric' Cc: Schmidt, Jon; 'Taylor, Gina'; 'Cebryk, Doug'; Alstad, Jon Subject: RE: Additional Agency Correspondence Attached are some additional pieces of the puzzle; a supplement to the large set of correspondence/permitting requirements sent earlier. Scott J. Patti Senior Project Manager ENSR International 1601 Prospect Parkway Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone: (970) 493-8878 Fax: (970) 493-0213 Email: spatti@ensr.com -----Original Message----- From: Patti, Scott Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:54 AM To: 'Shafer, John'; Hyatt, Kevin; Gadd, Eric Cc: Schmidt, Jon; Taylor, Gina; Cebryk, Doug; Alstad, Jon Subject: Agencies and NGOs already contacted for Sun Devil US EPA, Regions VI and IX US Forest Service - Coconino, Kaibab, and Prescott Forests BLM - NM State Office, Farmington Field Office, AZ State Office, Phoenix Field Office US DOT US Army Corps of Engineers - LA District and NM District Navajo Nation - Mineral Department, Arizona Game and Fish Department Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Water Resources Arizona Department of Transportation New Mexico Department of Game and Fish New Mexico Forestry Division New Mexico Energy, Mineral and Natural Resources Department New Mexico Environment Department New Mexico Office of the State Engineer New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department Union Pacific Railroad The Nature Conservancy Attached are most of the telephone call summary sheets from these conversations and summaries of permit requirements. We also have most of the permit applications for any of the permits that we would be obtaining from these agencies. I am currently working on the telephone call summary sheets for the Forest Service contacts. Scott J. Patti Senior Project Manager ENSR International 1601 Prospect Parkway Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone: (970) 493-8878 Fax: (970) 493-0213 Email: spatti@ensr.com -----Original Message----- From: Shafer, John [mailto:John.Shafer@ENRON.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: Patti, Scott; Hyatt, Kevin; Gadd, Eric Cc: Schmidt, Jon; Taylor, Gina; Cebryk, Doug Subject: RE: Confidentiality of Sun Devil??? Yes, please forward a list to myself, Kevin and Eric. Thanks, John -----Original Message----- From: Patti, Scott [mailto:SPatti@ensr.com] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 4:49 PM To: Shafer, John; Hyatt, Kevin; Gadd, Eric Cc: Schmidt, Jon; Taylor, Gina; Cebryk, Doug Subject: RE: Confidentiality of Sun Devil??? We have already been in contact primarily with most of the state and Federal level agencies that exist in both AZ and NM as well as the Navajo agencies. I could get you a complete list of agencies we've contacted if you'd like, but almost every agency that would or could issue a permit in both states has been contacted. Scott J. Patti Senior Project Manager ENSR International 1601 Prospect Parkway Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone: (970) 493-8878 Fax: (970) 493-0213 Email: spatti@ensr.com -----Original Message----- From: Shafer, John [mailto:John.Shafer@ENRON.com] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:49 PM To: Hyatt, Kevin; Gadd, Eric Cc: Patti, Scott; Schmidt, Jon; Taylor, Gina; Cebryk, Doug Subject: RE: Confidentiality of Sun Devil??? Scott, Please furnish a list of who you will be talking with. (Caveat: Scott, you certainly realize that you must provide the FERC with summary notes of meetings with groups, agencies, etc. when we make the FERC filing - so keep good notes). John -----Original Message----- From: Hyatt, Kevin Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:44 PM To: Shafer, John; Gadd, Eric Cc: 'SPatti@ENSR.com'; 'JSchmidt@ENSR.com'; Taylor, Gina; Cebryk, Doug Subject: RE: Confidentiality of Sun Devil??? I spoke with Eric this afternoon. We'd like a list of who ENSR is talking with. We recognize the need to be as open as we can with stakeholders and consultees and concur with John's comment below. We're comfortable with Scott being able to show regulators a map of the preliminary route. thanks kh -----Original Message----- From: Shafer, John Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:41 PM To: Hyatt, Kevin; Gadd, Eric Cc: 'SPatti@ENSR.com'; 'JSchmidt@ENSR.com'; Taylor, Gina; Cebryk, Doug Subject: FW: Confidentiality of Sun Devil??? Kevin and Eric, Please read Scott's question below. I have no problem with being a little more open with the regulators. I would not publish anything in the paper (as yet) showing a route, etc., etc. as that will only get the landowners stirred up before we are ready. What are your thoughts? Are you comfortable with Scott being able to show the regulators a map of a preliminary route? John -----Original Message----- From: Patti, Scott [mailto:SPatti@ensr.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:30 PM To: Cebryk, Doug; Shafer, John; Campbell, Larry Cc: Kendrick, William; Hyatt, Kevin; Schmidt, Jon; Alstad, Jon; Wade, Alisa Subject: Confidentiality of Sun Devil??? In discussions with several agency personnel, it "appears" as though they are somewhat aware of Sun Devil. Is it still to be treated as confidential, or can we discuss it more freely? The main benefit I see, if we can discuss it more freely, is that many of the regulators have said things like "I would need to see a route to be able to answer your question better." Let me know. Thanks, Scott Scott J. Patti Senior Project Manager ENSR International 1601 Prospect Parkway Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone: (970) 493-8878 Fax: (970) 493-0213 Email: spatti@ensr.com ********************************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential and privileged proprietary information intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. It is our policy that e-mails are intended for and should be used for business purposes only. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ENSR www.ensr.com postmaster@ensr.com ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************