Message-ID: <25272124.1075842237113.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:59:00 -0800 (PST)
From: dan.hyvl@enron.com
To: grant.oh@enron.com
Subject: Re: crestar / gulf aos contract....
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Dan J Hyvl
X-To: Grant Oh
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HYVL-D
X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf

Grant,
 The problem is that they do not want to assign the agreement.  They want to 
do a partial assignment which is unacceptable unless we can severe the 
document so that we have two separate stand alone pieces of paper after the 
assignment.  Talk to them about doing two Spot Confirmations, one for 0 to 
8,400 MMBtu per day which would not be assignable, and the other one for 0 to 
11,600 MMBtu per day which would be assignable to BP.  Call me so that we can 
discuss.



	Grant Oh
	03/19/2001 05:16 PM
		
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: crestar / gulf aos contract....

Keyspan/Crestar would like to execute the existing contract as is - and work 
on the assignment ot BP separately.

Thanks

Grant




Dan J Hyvl
03/19/2001 04:17 PM
To: Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: crestar / gulf aos contract....  

I am waiting on your response to my voice mail regarding the assignment to 
BP.  Shouldn't we break the confirm into two documents, covering 42% of the 
entitlements to Crestar and 58% to BP. 



	Grant Oh
	03/19/2001 01:33 PM
		 
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: crestar / gulf aos contract....

Dan, following up on the status of the contract.  

Thanks

Grant