Message-ID: <8981657.1075842219221.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 05:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jennifer.blay@enron.com
To: dan.hyvl@enron.com
Subject: Re: City of Pasadena
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jennifer Blay
X-To: Dan J Hyvl
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HYVL-D
X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf

No, it does not amend an existing deal...
For some reason I thought this was a special counterparty!

thx
jennifer




Dan J Hyvl
09/19/2000 12:38 PM
To: Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: City of Pasadena  

Jennifer,
 I assisted the trader in documenting a deal that was a retrade of an earlier 
deal.  There is no reason that you can't prepare the confirm for the current 
trade.  Does it modify the existing deal in any manner?  If so, we may need 
to amend the existing deal.  Please advise.  



	Jennifer Blay
	09/19/2000 12:34 PM
		 
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: City of Pasadena

I have a physical forward with the City of Pasedena, traded 09/18/00.  There 
is a master in place, however, I thought you confirmed this counterparty.

Please let me know
Thanks
Jennifer