Message-ID: <18494803.1075842253356.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:28:00 -0800 (PST) From: grant.oh@enron.com To: dan.hyvl@enron.com Subject: Re: crestar / gulf aos contract.... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Grant Oh X-To: Dan J Hyvl X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\Gas\Crestar X-Origin: HYVL-D X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf Dan, Gulf/Keyspan have agreed to the two separate documents without a specific contract number. Please prepare and send up to me There is one revision to the volumes, they are 11,740 and 8260 rather than 11600 and 8400 Thanks Grant PS - have you read the assignment agreement and if so, do you anticipate any issues? Dan J Hyvl 03/20/2001 07:59 AM To: Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: crestar / gulf aos contract.... Grant, The problem is that they do not want to assign the agreement. They want to do a partial assignment which is unacceptable unless we can severe the document so that we have two separate stand alone pieces of paper after the assignment. Talk to them about doing two Spot Confirmations, one for 0 to 8,400 MMBtu per day which would not be assignable, and the other one for 0 to 11,600 MMBtu per day which would be assignable to BP. Call me so that we can discuss. Grant Oh 03/19/2001 05:16 PM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: crestar / gulf aos contract.... Keyspan/Crestar would like to execute the existing contract as is - and work on the assignment ot BP separately. Thanks Grant Dan J Hyvl 03/19/2001 04:17 PM To: Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: crestar / gulf aos contract.... I am waiting on your response to my voice mail regarding the assignment to BP. Shouldn't we break the confirm into two documents, covering 42% of the entitlements to Crestar and 58% to BP. Grant Oh 03/19/2001 01:33 PM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: crestar / gulf aos contract.... Dan, following up on the status of the contract. Thanks Grant